This report provides a probabilistic, AI-generated analysis. It may contain errors and should not be relied on as the sole basis for legal, employment, medical, or safety-critical decisions.
No significant concern signals were detected in this content.
At a Glance
This analysis examines a spontaneous, highly viral recording of a civilian detainment. The central observable behavioral finding is the subject's abrupt transition from direct, high-arousal verbal confrontation to a rhythmic, chanting performance ('You about to lose yo job'). This shift represents a dynamic coping mechanism, channeling acute frustration into a culturally resonant form of non-violent defiance and agency reclamation while physically restrained. Behavioral consistency indicators strongly support the authenticity of the reaction; the subject's rapid, uninhibited speech and congruent full-body movements reflect genuine, in-the-moment processing of a stressful encounter. There are no indicators of rehearsal or synthetic manipulation. While the video was not created as an information operation, its organic viral spread demonstrates how authentic, highly emotive raw footage can be adopted by broader cultural movements. The footage stands as a verified, spontaneous recording with no unresolved tensions regarding its authenticity or the immediate behavioral reality of the subject.
Visibility
Full body visible, hands restrained behind back.
Baseline Posture
Standing, restrained, shifting weight.
Gesture Patterns
Uses head thrusts and torso leans to emphasize speech.
Compensatory illustrators due to hands being restrained.
Begins rhythmic stepping and hip swaying ('Get this dance').
Physical manifestation of the rhythmic taunt; reasserting physical agency while restrained.
Posture Shifts
From: Static confrontational stance To: Dynamic rhythmic movement
Transition from arguing to chanting.
With her hands restrained, P1 relies entirely on head movements, facial expressions, and eventually full-body rhythmic stepping to express herself. The shift to dancing serves as a mechanism to reclaim agency and mock the authority figure detaining her.
Setting
Nighttime outdoor setting, likely a parking lot. Illuminated primarily by the camera operator's light.
Objects of Interest
Handcuffs
Confirms P1 is physically restrained
First seen: 00:00:00.000
Security badge/uniform on P2
Establishes P2's authority role
First seen: 00:00:00.000
Camera & Production
raw footageMovement: Handheld, slightly shaky, tracking P1's movements.
Angles: Eye-level, close proximity.
Transitions: Continuous single take.
Notable: Camera operator keeps the light focused directly on P1.
Lighting & Color
Harsh direct lighting from the camera/phone against a dark background.
Composition
Intimate, confrontational framing typical of citizen journalism or bystander recording.
Requires human review. These interpretations are AI-generated assessments, not definitive conclusions.
The video is highly authentic. It is a well-documented, verified piece of raw footage from February 2020. The behavioral responses, environmental lighting, and audio-visual sync are entirely consistent with a spontaneous, real-world recording. There are no technical or contextual indicators of manipulation.
Caveats
Assessment is based on visual evidence and strong OSINT corroboration of the event.
No indicators of synthetic media or manipulation were detected. The visual and audio channels are congruent, displaying natural physiological markers, appropriate environmental acoustics, and realistic lighting interactions.
Cited Evidence
Caveats
Visual-only synthetic media detection has fundamental limitations, though OSINT strongly corroborates this specific video.
Requires human review. These interpretations are AI-generated assessments, not definitive conclusions.
Supporting
[00:00:00.000] High emotional arousal and spontaneous, uninhibited reaction are consistent with a genuine response to an unwanted detainment.
Cognitive Load
Low cognitive load; speech is rapid, spontaneous, and fluid, indicating she is reacting in the moment without filtering.
Linguistic Markers
Extensive use of repetition in the second half ('You about to lose yo job') serves as a rhythmic anchor rather than a stalling tactic.
IO Role Hypothesis
Genuine subject reacting spontaneously to a stressful real-world encounter.
Alternative Explanations
The rhythmic performance could be interpreted as performative for the camera, but it is equally consistent with a spontaneous coping mechanism to manage the stress of being restrained.
Caveats
Behavioral analysis of a highly stressful, spontaneous event captures the subject's immediate emotional reality, but cannot verify the legal or factual circumstances of the detainment itself.
P1
Inflection Points
[00:00:20.000] Shift from direct argument to rhythmic chanting, marking a change in coping strategy.
P1 begins in a state of acute frustration and anger regarding her detainment. At 00:20, she abruptly shifts her emotional expression from raw anger to a stylized, rhythmic taunt. This transition channels her high arousal into a culturally resonant form of defiance.
Requires human review. These interpretations are AI-generated assessments, not definitive conclusions.
Narrative Structure
The video organically captures a narrative of civilian defiance against perceived unjust authority.
Problem: Unjust detainment by a security guard.
Cause: Overzealous or unjustified action by authority.
Solution: Verbal and rhythmic resistance; predicting consequences for the authority figure.
Target Audience
Not originally created for a target audience, but its viral spread resonated strongly with audiences sympathetic to themes of police/security overreach and cultural resilience.
Ecosystem Fit
The video was later adopted organically into the broader ecosystem of the 2020 protests as a humorous, defiant anthem, though it was not produced as a coordinated IO asset.
Uncertainty
The video is a genuine cultural artifact, not a strategic information operation.
Topic
A woman is detained by a security guard and spontaneously begins singing and dancing to protest her detainment.
Event / Issue
Trespassing dispute outside a club in Dillon, South Carolina (February 2020).
Timeframe
February 5, 2020, based on verified OSINT context.
Language
English (African American Vernacular English)
Cultural context
US street encounter / informal detainment setting
Cultural & linguistic impact
The subject utilizes African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and rhythmic chanting/dancing as a form of spontaneous protest and emotional regulation. In this cultural context, rhythmic taunting serves as a non-violent mechanism to assert agency and express defiance when physically restrained. The behavioral baseline must account for this expressive coping strategy rather than interpreting it merely as erratic behavior.
Performance context
Spontaneous — Unscripted delivery; standard behavioral framing applies.
OSINT Context
The video features Johnniqua Charles being detained by security guard Julius Locklear outside a club in South Carolina in February 2020. Charles's spontaneous song 'You about to lose yo job' went viral and was later remixed by music producers, becoming an anthem during the 2020 protests. Locklear recorded and posted the video because he found the reaction entertaining.
Uncertainty
The exact moments leading up to the detainment are not captured in this specific clip.
Johnniqua Charles
The woman featured in the video who improvised the viral 'You About to Lose Yo Job' song while being detained. At the time of the incident, she was experiencing homelessness and addiction, but the viral success of the video helped her reunite with her family, raise funds, and improve her living situation.
Julius Locklear
The security guard who detained Charles and originally posted the video online because he found her rap entertaining. He did not lose his job and has continued working in security and bail enforcement.
DJ iMarkkeyz (Brandon Markell Davidson) and DJ Suede the Remix God
The music producers who remixed Charles's impromptu song into a viral track that became a popular anthem during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests and the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
GodFirstAlways (YouTube Handle: UCyEnrkWl19fZa3rn8ju40Nw)
The YouTube user who uploaded the video. There is no public information indicating this account belongs to a public figure or anyone directly involved in the incident; it appears to be an aggregator or fan account.
Event Context
The video stems from an incident on February 5, 2020, outside the Diamonds Gentlemen's Club in Dillon, South Carolina. Johnniqua Charles was detained for trespassing by security guard Julius Locklear after she tried to re-enter the closed club to retrieve her purse. While handcuffed, Charles spontaneously sang and danced, 'You about to lose yo job, 'cause you are detaining me for nothing.' Locklear's colleague filmed the encounter, and Locklear later posted it online. Police arrived shortly after and released Charles without charges. The video went massively viral in June 2020, being remixed into a protest anthem during the Black Lives Matter movement and later used as a celebratory meme during the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
Sources
Searched 2026-04-21
P1 argues with P2 about being detained without cause.
P1 displays high arousal, confrontational affect, and indignation. Delivery is rapid and aggressive, utilizing head movements to emphasize points since her hands are restrained.
P1 transitions into a spontaneous, rhythmic chant and dance.
Affect shifts from direct anger to mocking defiance. P1 establishes a rhythmic cadence, incorporating full-body movement (stepping, hip swaying) to accompany her vocal taunts.
System
Automated behavioral analysis with expression coding. Video frames, audio, speech content, and temporal patterns are analyzed across multiple modalities.
Expression Coding
Expressions are classified using action unit analysis and mapped to emotion prototypes using probabilistic matching, not deterministic rules.
Expression Taxonomy
The system classifies expressions into 7 basic emotions, 15 compound emotions, and an ambiguous category (23 types total):
Confidence Scoring
Each expression event receives a confidence score from 0.0 to 1.0 based on visibility, duration, context, and cultural fit. Scores reflect model certainty in its classification, not ground truth accuracy.
Incongruence Detection
Speech-expression incongruence is flagged when the detected facial expression contradicts the concurrent verbal content. Incongruence is an indicator for further investigation, not evidence of deception.
Important Disclaimers
Video Quality
Harsh directional lighting obscures the background and partially shadows P2's face.
Detection Challenges
P1's hands are restrained behind her back, preventing the analysis of hand-based illustrators or adaptors.
Cultural Considerations
The subject's use of rhythmic chanting and dancing is a culturally specific coping and resistance mechanism. It must be interpreted as a coherent, expressive response to stress rather than erratic or nonsensical behavior.
Confidence Caveats
High confidence in the behavioral observations of P1; low confidence in assessing P2 due to limited visibility and participation.
Probabilistic analysis. This report was generated by artificial intelligence and may contain errors, inaccuracies, or subjective interpretations. Authenticity signals and behavioral patterns are model-based assessments that should be one input among many. Nothing herein constitutes professional, legal, medical, or investigative advice. Use this report to inform your judgment, especially before making financial, reputational, or safety-critical decisions. Kinexis.AI disclaims all liability for decisions made based on this content.
\u00a9 2026 Web3 Studios LLC. All rights reserved. This Kinexis.AI report contains proprietary analytical frameworks, structured analysis, and compilation of findings that are protected by copyright. The AI-generated analytical content within this report is provided under license. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or republication of this report, in whole or in part, is prohibited without prior written permission.
